Stop chasing incidents. Start predicting them.
Rather than reacting to incidents after they occur, SRE platforms are moving toward predictive observability – using AI/ML models to forecast future issues and detect anomalies in real-time. This feature embeds forecasting algorithms and anomaly detection models into the telemetry pipeline. The goal is to predict outages or performance degradation before they impact users, enabling proactive interventions (scale up resources, roll back a deployment, etc.). It also involves advanced correlation logic (often graph-based) to pinpoint the likely root cause among a sea of signals.
In fast-moving, distributed environments, traditional alerting and dashboards are too slow. By the time you see a spike in errors or CPU saturation, users are already impacted. Predictive observability changes that by forecasting failures, degradations, and anomalies before they occur, giving teams critical time to act.
As metrics, logs, and traces stream into the observability platform, an AI/ML analysis engine continuously evaluates them. Time-series forecasting models project future trends for key metrics (CPU, memory, throughput, error rate, etc.) based on
historical patterns. For example, if disk usage has been growing, the model might forecast when it will reach 100% and alert ahead of time. Similarly, anomaly detection models monitor incoming data for deviations from normal behavior.
A critical aspect is handling seasonality and trends. The ML models are trained on historical data (with periodic retraining or online learning) to learn typical patterns – daily traffic cycles, weekly peaks, etc. This way, they can distinguish a genuine anomaly from a predictable fluctuation. Modern anomaly monitors (e.g. Datadog’s) separate the trend and seasonality from the metric to detect when the metric deviates beyond an acceptable range.
The platform allows users to set forecast-based alerts: e.g., “alert me if the model predicts CPU > 90% in the next 1 hour.” Datadog introduced such metric forecasts years ago, enabling alerts with lead time. This is incredibly useful for capacity planning – you might get a notification saying “Database storage will run out in 3 days” because the system extrapolated the current growth trend.
Seasonal ARIMA and Prophet for periodic trends
The AI/ML Analysis Engine ingests live metrics and events, applying forecasting models and anomaly detectors continuously. It also takes into account a Service Dependency Graph – knowledge of how components relate – to perform graph-based correlation. When a potential issue is identified (e.g. an anomaly or an ominous forecast), the engine produces predictive alerts and RCA insights. These might be delivered as alerts in the UI, with explanations like “Metric X is projected to exceed threshold in 30 minutes” or “Service B’s anomaly is likely caused by Service C’s failure”. A feedback loop (dashed arrow) allows the system to learn from confirmations or false alarms, refining its models over time.
Many observability platforms already have some anomaly detection capability (often termed “AIOps”). To implement this feature,they extend those with more advanced algorithms and user controls. For instance, the user might be able to toggle on ML forecasting for any metric with one click, or configure how sensitive the anomaly detection should be. The
platform also must integrate with existing alerting: an anomaly or forecast is treated similar to a monitor triggering. Under the hood, the platform might use open-source libraries (like Facebook Prophet or custom neural nets) but heavily optimized for streaming data and scale. A key challenge is noise reduction – initial anomaly systems often flood users with alerts. The graph correlation helps filter noise by focusing on root causes (e.g. if 10 services all alert, the system might realize they all depend on one database and only surface the database issue as the actionable alert).
Datadog’s Watchdog can detect anomalies and even do a bit of forecasting with its “Trend” alerts. It also automatically correlates related anomalies. Dynatrace’s Davis not only flags anomalies but automatically pinpoints the root cause using its Smartscape dependency graph. These are early steps toward the fully realized predictive observability described here. In
the near future, we can expect these systems to incorporate more sophisticated AI (perhaps foundation models specialized for time-series) – for instance, Datadog has been developing a time-series foundation model called “Toto”. These will further improve the accuracy of forecasts and correlations, giving SREs a crystal ball to foresee incidents and drastically reduce downtime.
Detect early signs of:
Trigger tests, retraining jobs, or fallbacks before production models are impacted.
“If current load trends continue, Service A will exceed its memory allocation in 35 minutes.”
→ Teams are alerted early with autoscaling or restart suggestions.
“The new version of the auth service is predicted to introduce a 15% latency regression under normal weekday load.”
→ Predictive insights help teams catch regressions before rollout.
“Model accuracy is forecasted to drop below 80% within 48 hours due to feature distribution drift.”
→ Trigger retraining or alert MLOps team proactively.
It also integrates into alerting and collaboration tools like Slack, Teams, PagerDuty, and ServiceNow.
Start Your Free Trial
Join leading engineering teams who’ve reduced MTTR by 75% and achieved 99.9% uptime with AI-powered observability.
No credit card required · 14-day trial · Full platform access
